If the boy's rectum don't fit, then you must acquit! --

.... trying to reason why 12 jurors concluded "not guilty", Coverguy may have hit the nail on the head ...

THEY WERE THERE TO CONCLUDE IF MICHAEL JACKSON MOLESTED A CHILD, NOT IF A MOTHER NEGLECTED AND WAS A PIECE OF SHIT!!!!!!!

Thank you WuzzaDem,

Juror #11
I just can't understand what's wrong with that mother. What kind of parent would let their kids sleep with a child molester? She should be charged with child endangerment.

Juror #5
You know, I was on her side, then she got all bitchy and started copping a 'tude on the stand, and I was all, "You can kiss your guilty verdict goodbye, lady."


Juror #7
Exactly! You know, she was looking right at me while she was talking. It's like, "Excuse me - have we been introduced?"


Juror #9
I just didn't like that DA. What's his name, Sneedon?


Juror #11
Sneddon.


Juror #9
Right, Sneddon. The very first day of the trial he was standing right there in the courtroom talking about sex. And not just regular sex, mind you, he was talking about people having sex with little boys! It was disgusting. I just started tuning him out.


Juror #4
Yeah, and he was all old and wrinkly. He looks like that Hans Moleman dude from The Simpsons. He creeped me out. I mean, you know, Sneddon, not Hans Moleman.


Reporter
Were all of you completely convinced from the beginning that Jackson was innocent?


Juror #6
No, I think he might have done it, but I think that kid's mother was lying, and I was raised to believe that you don't reward people for doing the wrong thing.

Process this -- HE WAS NEVER ACCUSED OF MOLESTATION OF THE MOTHER -- there is no way that the mother, at this point, was anymore irresponsible then the jurors on this case -- this was not a neglect case against the mother!

I agree, the mother sucked -- but if someone allows their children to be in the bed with a psycho like Michael -- she probably won't win mother of the year. How does the fact that she sucked as a parent excuse or justify the molestion?????

I will get into details in a later post, but me say that the fact that they were so bewildered by the mother behavior and past, compared to the behavior and past of the defendant...PLEASE.

Before anyone points the figure at the mother for neglect -- jury, I have a verdict for you -- and I will put it in terms so that Juror #11 can comprehend.....

Juror #11

I just can't understand what's wrong with that jury. What kind of jury would let a child molester sleep with a child? They should be charged with child endangerment.